The Left Place

Share this post

Will the Senate's Bipartisan Agreement on Gun Control Be Enough to Finally Reduce Gun Violence?

theleftplace.substack.com

Discover more from The Left Place

Politics mostly (but sometimes I write about other stuff)
Continue reading
Sign in

Will the Senate's Bipartisan Agreement on Gun Control Be Enough to Finally Reduce Gun Violence?

Is this negotiation better than nothing? Certainly. But without an assault weapons ban, will it be effective against mass gunmen's weapon of choice?

Ted Millar
Jun 21, 2022
Share this post

Will the Senate's Bipartisan Agreement on Gun Control Be Enough to Finally Reduce Gun Violence?

theleftplace.substack.com
Share
black rifle on brown and yellow surface
Photo by Bexar Arms on Unsplash

Last week, a group of senators—10 Democrats, 10 republicans—reached a bipartisan agreement on gun safety that could lead to new federal firearms regulations, including increasing funding for mental health and school security.

Twitter avatar for @AP
The Associated Press @AP
BREAKING: Senate bargainers announced a bipartisan framework responding to last month’s mass shootings, a modest breakthrough offering measured gun curbs and bolstered efforts to improve school safety and mental health programs.
apne.wsSenate negotiators announce a deal on guns, breaking logjamWASHINGTON (AP) — Senate bargainers on Sunday announced the framework of a bipartisan response to last month’s mass shootings, a noteworthy but limited breakthrough offering modest gun curbs and stepped-up efforts to improve school safety and mental health programs.
4:02 PM ∙ Jun 12, 2022
642Likes249Retweets
Twitter avatar for @ChrisMurphyCT
Chris Murphy @ChrisMurphyCT
🚨NEWS: We have a deal. Today a bipartisan group of 20 Senators (10 D and 10 R) is announcing a breakthrough agreement on gun violence - the first in 30 years - that will save lives. I think you’ll be surprised at the scope of our framework. 1/ Here’s what it includes:
3:52 PM ∙ Jun 12, 2022
125,598Likes22,180Retweets
Twitter avatar for @axios
Axios @axios
BREAKING: Bipartisan Senate group releases bill text for gun safety deal
trib.alBipartisan group of senators introduce gun control legislation in the wake of mass shootingsIt’s the most significant gun safety package considered by the Senate in decades.
10:35 PM ∙ Jun 21, 2022
310Likes133Retweets

The agreement includes incentivizing more states to pass “red-flag laws,” legislation designed to permit law enforcement or family members to petition courts for temporary firearm removal if individuals pose potential danger to themselves or others.

Currently, 19 states and Washington, D.C. have red flag laws.

The agreement also calls for strengthening the existing background check process by requiring a period of time to review juvenile (under 21 years old) potential gun buyers’ mental health records. 

Closing domestic violence loopholes are also on the table by extending current laws barring convicted felons and those convicted of domestic violence to abusive dating partners with domestic violence convictions or restraining orders, colloquially referred to as the "boyfriend loophole."

Clamping down on straw purchases—purchasing a firearm for someone else—and gun trafficking are in it as well, as is clarifying the definition of a “federally licensed firearms dealer,” which present law defines as "a person who devotes time, attention, and labor to dealing in firearms as a regular course of trade or business with the principal objective of livelihood and profit through the repetitive purchase and resale of firearms."

Excluded are those who occasionally sell firearms or sell them as a hobby.

While the bipartisan agreement does not included language about universal background checks, some argue tightening the language about what constitutes a federally licensed dealer is a significant step forward.

Also agreed upon is increasing funding for school safety and mental health services wherein states would be able to receive funding for “Certified Community Behavioral Clinics” for mental health and substance abuse services.

This agreement does not, however, address the fact that more than one-third of Americans live in areas in dire need of mental health professionals.

More than 7,000 additional health providers would be needed to rectify this shortage.

Praising the bipartisan negotiation, vice president of the gun control group, Brady, Christian Heyne, explained:

“We have not seen the likes of a framework like what we see in this package for the last 30 years. And I think it’s significant not only because of how this can have a real impact on lives, but to me it feels like a moment in time and a sign of things to come, right? This is sort of testing ground that we can pass bipartisan gun laws and the sky won’t fall. And for all of those reasons, I think that this agreement is really important.”

Brady President Kris Brown tweeted:

Twitter avatar for @KrisB_Brown
Kris Brown | President, bradyunited.org @KrisB_Brown
The Senate's gun violence prevention legislation is a meaningful step forward. Americans are fed up with America's gun violence epidemic and want to see our senators pass common-sense solutions. We must act now. @MSNBC
msnbc.com“I would rate it for our movement as an A+”: Brady President on bipartisan gun dealPresident of Brady, Kris Brown, joins Chris Jansing to discuss the bipartisan framework agreement on gun legislation.
9:32 PM ∙ Jun 13, 2022
13Likes6Retweets

While bipartisan support on just about anything today, let alone gun legislation, should celebrated, some are arguing this framework is mere tokenism.

Some experts argue the agreement’s limited provisions wouldn’t have prevented the Uvalde, Texas Robb Elementary School shooting last month.

One reason for that is the agreement does not include reinstating an assault weapons ban like the one in effect from 1994 to 2004 that reduced mass shootings 43%.

Twitter avatar for @BernieSanders
Bernie Sanders @BernieSanders
It shouldn't matter what age you are. No one needs an AR-15 or any other assault weapon designed to massacre people. When we had an assault weapons ban from 1994-2004, mass shootings went down 43%. After it expired, mass shootings tripled. End the filibuster. Ban assault weapons.
9:57 PM ∙ May 27, 2022
241,257Likes38,453Retweets

Along with that is no mention of altering gun buyers’ required minimum age to purchase assault-style weapons.

There is heavy emphasis on republicans’ “mental health” excuse du-jour, though, despite the fact that the United States does not hold a monopoly on mental illness.

Other countries have mentally ill people too, but no other country has our number of guns and gun deaths.

All countries the world over average 9.86 guns per 100 civilians.

The United States, though?

120.5 guns per 100 people.

Most Americans, even gun owners, agree with stricter gun control measures.

But not the base of the modern-day republican party pulling the majorities’ strings.

A CBS and YouGov survey administered to 2,021 American adults between June 1st through 3rd, one week after the Uvalde, Texas Robb Elementary School massacre, found 44%—nearly half of respondents identifying as republicans—feel we should accept mass shootings as the price of living in a free society.

The “MAGA” reaction to last week’s bipartisan framework?

Twitter avatar for @RonFilipkowski
Ron Filipkowski 🇺🇦 @RonFilipkowski
MAGA reaction to today’s news of a bi-partisan compromise in the Senate for gun control bill.
Image
Image
Image
Image
8:24 PM ∙ Jun 12, 2022
2,059Likes547Retweets

Just as we’ve come to expect.

Texas republican senator John Cornyn, one of the 10 GOP members to work with Democrats, said:

"Look at all the things that President Biden said he wanted--none of that's in there.”

By dint of just working with Democrats, Cornyn is being vilified.

Here he getting booed trying to address Texas republicans at their state convention:

Is this negotiation better than nothing?

Certainly.

But mass shootings will not end in the United States of America unless we pass comprehensive gun control legislation that includes tightening and re-signing the Assault Weapons Ban, passing national universal background checks, and requiring prospective gun owners to undergo training and certification that includes viewing images of the damage guns do.

We need to treat owning guns like owning cars.

From manufacture to destruction, cars are required to maintain chains of ownership through titles.

That way state DMVs and law enforcement agencies know from year to year who owns the vehicles should they be involved in accidents or crimes.

While vehicles have the potential to kill people, killing is not their reason to existence.

But it is the reason guns exist.

We insure vehicles to protect ourselves and others in the event they are involved in accidents.

But we aren’t required to insure guns.

We require drivers’ licenses to prove proficiency.

But we don’t with guns.

As progressive radio personality and author Thom Hartmann wrote:

“When you buy a gun, it gets registered with the state. Every year that registration is renewed for a small fee that covers the expenses to the state of gun injuries, gun suicides and homicides. If you lose or sell that gun, just like if your car gets stolen or sold, you immediately notify the state. Having or using a gun that is unregistered would be just as much an offense as trying to drive an unregistered car on the freeway.

“State DMV’s could easily expand their services to include a written test and a shooting range, so people who want to become gun owners can demonstrate that they understand the laws in the state, common-sense gun ownership practices, and have a level of proficiency that makes it far less likely they will accidentally kill themselves or others. 

“This could even be a revenue source for the states, and while a gun shop could sell you a gun without a shooter’s license, they wouldn’t let you leave the premises with it until you get your license.”

“Free-market” libertarians and republicans should love this since “it would create a whole new marketplace for the insurance industry, which has done very, very well over the years with car insurance.”

None of these proposals runs afoul of the sacrosanct Second Amendment that was written in 1791 to protect slave patrols and is the only right required to be “well-regulated.”

Share this post

Will the Senate's Bipartisan Agreement on Gun Control Be Enough to Finally Reduce Gun Violence?

theleftplace.substack.com
Share
Comments
Top
New
Community

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Ted Millar
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing